The Punjab and Haryana High Court has made it clear that not being of marriageable age doesn’t deprive individuals of their fundamental rights, particularly the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. This ruling emphasizes the state’s duty to protect every citizen’s life and liberty, regardless of age or marital status.
Key Aspects of the Judgment: –
Fundamental Rights: Article 21 guarantees protection of life and liberty to every citizen.
Age and Marriageability: Being below the marriageable age doesn’t negate an individual’s right to protection.
Live-in Relationships: The court has granted protection to live-in couples, prioritizing their safety over marital status.
State’s Responsibility: It’s the state’s bounden duty to safeguard citizens’ life and liberty.
Context of the Cases- Gurdeep Kaur & Anr. v. State of Punjab & Ors.: The court directed police protection for a couple facing threats from family members.
Protection Pleas: Couples in live-in relationships have sought protection citing threats to their life and liberty.
Implications
Protection Under Article 21: Individuals can seek protection regardless of marriageable age.
Safety and Liberty: Courts prioritize safeguarding citizens’ fundamental rights.
This judgment underscores the importance of constitutional rights and the state’s role in ensuring citizens’ safety and liberty.
The High Court’s ruling affirms that individuals’ fundamental rights, particularly under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, remain intact regardless of whether they are of marriageable age. The judgment underscores the state’s obligation to protect citizens’ life and liberty, emphasizing that these rights are inviolable and not contingent on marital status or age. By prioritizing safety and constitutional protections, the court reinforces the broad applicability of fundamental rights for all individuals.
