The Allahabad High Court has recently emphasized that judicial orders and court documents are not the place for filthy or abusive language. In a notable ruling, Justice Harvir Singh directed all judicial officers in Uttar Pradesh to refrain from recording abusive words in orders and witness statements, stressing that such language is “unwarranted and inappropriate”.
Key Aspects of the Judgment-
Decorum and Dignity: The court highlighted that the language used in judicial orders should reflect the dignity of the judicial post.
Direction to Judicial Officers: The Allahabad High Court ordered circulation of its directive among all UP judicial officers for compliance.
Previous Guidelines: The apex court and High Court have previously stressed using “decent and normal language” in judicial proceedings.
Case Context: The ruling came while dismissing a revision petition under the SC/ST Act, where the court found insufficient evidence and noted improper language usage.
Implications-
Maintaining Professionalism: Judicial officers are urged to ensure decorum in court proceedings.
Language in Court Records: Abusive words in pleadings and witness testimonies are considered unwarranted.
Upholding Judicial Standards: Reflects judicial commitment to professionalism and dignity in legal processes.
In Conclusion, The Allahabad High Court has underscored that judicial orders and court documents should maintain dignity and decorum, rebuking the use of filthy or abusive language. Emphasizing professionalism, Justice Harvir Singh directed Uttar Pradesh judicial officers to refrain from recording such words in orders and witness statements, stressing unwarranted language has no place in judicial proceedings. This ruling reflects the judiciary’s commitment to upholding standards of language and conduct, ensuring dignity is maintained in legal processes.
